Disclosing contraventions or potential contraventions by issuers is an important part of the licensing regime. It enables us to monitor the extent and nature of non-compliance by the issuers being supervised; assess whether the supervisor has adequate plans to respond to a breach; monitor the effectiveness of that action; if necessary work collaboratively, where appropriate, with supervisors to ensure they take steps to address any breach.
When to report
Under section 203 of the FMC Act, the supervisor of a debt security or registered scheme must report to us a material contravention, or a possible material contravention, of an issuer’s obligations. The supervisor must also tell how they plan to act, and the timeline for the action. The obligation to report contains a materiality threshold, which requires a judgment to be made. We recommend a supervisor takes a precautionary approach and matters are reported where they have begun an internal discussion between supervisor staff as to whether the matter is material or not. This approach is consistent with:
- the purpose and function of section 203 reports
- a focus on investor protection
- the development of a mutually supportive relationship between us and supervisors.
In particular, if a potential contravention relates to a matter that may result in a statutory penalty for the issuer, the contravention should only go unreported if deemed immaterial, and the supervisor is comfortable that the relevant regulator will not take action.
If a supervisor thinks a contravention or likely contravention has occurred which may adversely impact the investors' interests, the contravention should be reported. It may be helpful to view the matter from an investor's perspective (ie, if you were an investor in the licensed entity, would you consider the contravention to be material?).
Following a section 203 report to us, we might not necessarily direct the supervisor to take a course of action, unless we see a clear need to do so to protect investors. There have been concerns that a supervisor could be liable to action (from a supervised entity) should a contravention reported be found to be immaterial. Both sections 203 and 204 of the FMC Act have provisions detailing that the protections of section 214 of the FMC Act apply to reports made in good faith.
What to report
We expect each report under section 203 to fully comply with sections 203(1)(a) and 203(1)(b) to tell us:
- what steps the supervisor plans to take when there is a contravention or possible contravention
- what date the steps are to be taken.
A date range can be provided. You need to tell us if you do not plan further action.
Following the initial section 203 notification, we may ask the supervisor for reports on the progress and success of the action taken by the supervisor to ensure the supervised entity is taking remedial action. We should be told if the supervised entity does not respond to the supervisor's plan.
