Statement of reasons
This notice, which comes into force on 13 May 2026 and is revoked on 12 May 2027 applies to BNZ Term PIE and to the manager of BNZ Term PIE (the Manager).
The notice relates to offers of units in the BNZ Term PIE (Fund). The notice exempts the Manager from the following provisions of the Financial Markets Conduct Regulations 2014 (Regulations):
- regulation 56 of Part 3 of the Regulations which requires a fund update to be made publicly available;
- regulation 62 of Part 3 of the Regulations which requires an annual report to be prepared;
- regulation 94 and 95 of Part 4 of the Regulations which requires the manager to provide limit break reporting;
- regulation 100 of Part 4 of the Regulations which requires the manager to provide related party reporting;
- clauses 18, 23(3)(b), 26(2)(c), 38(1) and 39(2) of Part 1 of Schedule 4 of the Regulations which detail the requirements relating to references to fund updates in the PDS for the Fund.
The exemption from regulation 56 and clauses 18 23(3)(b), 26(2)(c), 38(1) and 39(2) of Part 1 of Schedule 4 of the Regulations are subject to a condition that requires the key information summary in the product disclosure statement to include a statement that informs investors that the manager is not required to prepare or publish updates for the Fund under an exemption granted by the Financial Markets Authority.
The exemption only applies if units in the Fund meet the definition of “PIE term fund” in the Regulations (but where the term “specified unit” in that definition is replaced with the words “unit in the Fund”), that the Fund is distributed solely by Bank of New Zealand (BNZ) and that all assets of the Fund are invested in New Zealand dollar interest-bearing deposits with BNZ.
The offer of units in the BNZ Term PIE is in essence similar to PIE term fund units offered by other registered banks and their subsidiaries in that the funds of the BNZ Term PIE are only invested in deposits with BNZ, a registered bank, and distributed exclusively by BNZ.
The Manager is unable to rely on the statutory exclusion in clause 21(c) of Schedule 1 of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 Act (statutory exclusion) as it is no longer a subsidiary of BNZ due to a change in ownership. The exemptions and conditions ensure that, in relation to requirements for fund updates, annual reports, limit break and related party reporting, the offer of units in the BNZ Term PIE is treated similarly to Term PIEs offered under the statutory exclusion for other registered banks.
The Financial Markets Authority (FMA), after satisfying itself as to the matters set out in section 557 of the Act, considers it appropriate to grant the exemption because –
- PIE term fund units offered by registered banks and their subsidiaries are recognised under the Act as a low risk well understood financial product. Such PIE term fund units are excluded under the statutory exclusion from the disclosure provisions in Part 3 of the Act as full compliance with those initial and ongoing disclosure requirements is unlikely to provide helpful information for investors;
- the Manager’s offer of units in the Fund is in essence similar to PIE term fund units offered by registered banks and their subsidiaries in that the funds of the BNZ Term PIE are only invested in deposits with BNZ, a registered bank, and distributed exclusively by BNZ. The Manager is unable to rely on the statutory exclusion as it is no longer a subsidiary of BNZ due to a change in ownership;
- the exemptions in this notice are limited when compared to the statutory exclusion in that they relate to certain aspects relating to disclosures and lodgement of information with the Registrar rather than disclosures under all of Part 3 of the Act. The manager will continue to ensure that there is a PDS in respect of the Fund that includes all relevant disclosures other than that exempted under this notice;
- the exemptions avoid investor confusion as to why disclosures such as fund updates and annual reports are required in respect of the Fund when similar such disclosures are not required in respect of PIE term funds offered under the statutory exclusion by registered banks and their subsidiaries.
The FMA is therefore satisfied that granting the exemption is necessary or desirable in order to promote one or more of the main or additional purposes of the Act, specifically to promote and facilitate the development of fair, efficient, and transparent financial markets and to avoid unnecessary compliance costs, namely compliance with certain disclosures that registered banks and their subsidiaries offering PIE term deposits are not required to.
The exemption is not broader than reasonably necessary to address the matters that give rise to the exemptions because the exemption only exempts the Manager in respect of the offer of units in the Fund.
Dated at Wellington this 17th day of March 2026.
Liam Mason – Executive Director - Evaluation, Oversight & General Counsel