Page last updated: 12 December 2025

Enforcing the law

The FMA identifies and deals with market conduct that poses a risk to investors or customers. It is a critical part of our work. The purpose of enforcement is to hold to account anyone that breaches their legal obligations, and to deter others from engaging in misconduct. This page explains our enforcement policy and provides details of our enforcement activity.

Our enforcement policy is intended to guide and inform financial market participants. It is also intended to be a living policy and we may revise it from time to time according to what our objectives and priorities are. It is not exhaustive and is not binding.

View our enforcement policy page for more information on this topic.

The FMA’s prosecution policy explains when and how the FMA might take criminal action for serious misconduct. It supports our broader enforcement policy.

View our Prosecution Policy for more information [302KB]

In the event of a breach of financial markets legislation, we may intervene on an informal basis or at a low level where such action is proportionate to the misconduct and will achieve an appropriate market outcome. However, where appropriate, we will take strong action and hold individuals and entities accountable when they break the law and fail to meet the standards that are expected of them. If harm has been identified, we may also take regulatory action of some sort even though no ‘rules’ appear to have been broken.

View our list of enforcement activity

The hearings page outlines our approach to conducting hearings and explains the process we follow if you are entitled to a hearing and request one.

Read more about our approach to hearings

Individuals who are precluded from engaging in certain activities in respect of the governance and/or management of companies as a consequence of action taken by the FMA.

View the list of management bans and undertakings of non-participation

During the period 2006-2012, 51 New Zealand finance companies went into liquidation or receivership, or frozen payments. Many New Zealanders lost their money.

The scale and circumstances of the sector gave rise to concerns of inappropriate behaviour and breaches of the Securities Act and a programme of investigations into the failures was initiated.

Enforcement activity

Chance Voight
FMA investigation into Chance Voight entities with interim liquidation and asset preservation orders, plus upcoming Christchurch High Court hearings.
CBL
FMA civil proceedings against CBL and officers over disclosure breaches linked to the 2015 IPO and 2018 collapse with multiple penalties.
Saanvi 2022 Limited (trading as Saaga Mortgages)
FMA cancelled Saanvi 2022 Limited Saaga Mortgages FAP licence after altered loan documents, undisclosed referrals and privacy concerns.
David McEwen
FMA case involving David McEwen with a permanent stop order, criminal charges and conviction, and a seven year banning order in New Zealand.
Booster Investment Management Limited
FMA civil proceeding against Booster Investment Management for alleged FMC Act breaches in related party wine investments affecting Booster Schemes.
FMG Insurance Limited and Farmers' Mutual Group (FMG)
FMA case where FMG admitted fair dealing breaches in February 2026, remediated customers and paid $2.1m under an enforceable undertaking.
Aioi Nissay Dowa Insurance
FMA warning on Aioi Nissay Dowa Insurance for not applying advertised motor policy discounts, overcharging NZ customers for years.
Opes
FMA censured Opes Group Holding Company for FAP licence failures in record keeping, conflicts management, adviser oversight and client understanding.